← All stories

Namibia’s Trophy-Hunting Revenue Funds Conservation and Rural Benefits

Securing rural livelihoods: the case for sustainable trophy hunting in Namibia

Cheetahs sharing a fresh meal in the sunlight, highlighting their natural hunting behavior.

Photo by Derek Keats on Pexels

What changed

A Namibia-focused investigation traced how trophy-hunting money moves through community conservancies, conservation work and rural livelihoods. Between 2012 and 2019, conservancies received an average of $15,100 for an elephant, while the average 14-day hunt package cost $46,500.

Why it matters

The money is not abstract. Conservancies allowing trophy hunting spent an average of $1.83-million a year, including about $1-million on local wages and more than $700,000 on community benefits such as infrastructure, water security and scholarships.

Outfitters employed 235 local guides, trackers, skinners, camp workers and construction workers, paying nearly $200,000 a year in local wages. Donated hunt meat, worth more than $480,000 annually, also reached communities as an important source of affordable red meat.

That system rests on rights created by Namibia’s 1996 Nature Conservation Amendment Act. Communities living alongside wildlife gained conditional rights to manage and benefit from it, rather than bearing its costs with little control over the returns.

This is the practical pressure point in the debate over trophy-import restrictions. At least 20 African countries use hunting revenue for conservation and rural livelihoods, but the effect of restrictions on specific Namibian programmes remains uncertain. Any policy that cuts off the market would therefore need to account for the wages, community spending, conservation work and food already tied to it.

Sources (1)
  1. Daily Maverick - Latest NewsSecuring rural livelihoods: the case for sustainable trophy hunting in Namibia

Comments

No comments yet.