What changed
Manchester City’s appeal against findings over sponsorship funding is now before a new, independent three-person panel with legal expertise. The appeal is being heard in private.
City says key sponsorship deals were funded by the Abu Dhabi government rather than its owners, Abu Dhabi United Group, in what was described as a disguised funding scheme worth £830.69m. Etihad Airways rejects any suggestion of improper arrangements and is considering legal action.
Why it matters
This appeal puts the funding question back at the centre of Manchester City’s case. The panel must now decide how to treat the claim that sponsorship money came from a state source, even though Premier League rules allow state-owned bodies to sponsor clubs.
That distinction matters because City’s argument is not simply about the size of the deals. It is about who really provided the money. Abu Dhabi United Group is a private investment company belonging to Sheikh Mansour, the UAE’s vice-president and deputy prime minister. Etihad is owned by the sovereign wealth fund L'Imad, chaired by Abu Dhabi’s Crown Prince.
The process could run until 24 December if the usual 12-week timetable is followed, with a decision due within 30 days of the hearing’s conclusion. That timetable can be extended, so the appeal’s outcome remains unknown. Previous precedent suggests sanctions would come only after the appeal, though another appeal could follow any punishment.
Comments
No comments yet.